Comments on: Penn Jillette and Dr. Drew

By: Craig

Craig — Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:20:44 +0000

If Rolling Stone want people to read the article as fair and balanced, then why the hell did they title it “Death of a Douche”?

So Tiabbi but the extreme bias in the tittle and put the fair part at the end.

By: edawg

edawg — Fri, 09 Mar 2012 16:41:21 +0000

“See you in the field.” Classic. How’s your stash of MREs and 5.56, SR?

Just out of curiosity, do you have any experience in “the field,” or are you mostly holed up in momma’s basement? Just curious.

“That’s why the Left sets rules of engagement and discourse and the “Right” cravenly follows.”

That last is so deeply delusional it’s hard to know how you can even hold a job or wipe your own ass. Maybe you don’t.

By: Dick Face

Dick Face — Thu, 08 Mar 2012 17:51:39 +0000

Matt was just a little over the top and it’s not the language I would use…sound familiar Rush?…Hmm
Romney? so fuck Brietbart!

By: Cheap Seats

Cheap Seats — Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:21:46 +0000

Did Adam really play sports? I mean fairly. Two teams/players ONE set of rules. If death makes you off limits then it should apply to everyone and not just the one’s you’ve met and/or like. Breitbart triggered the balance by his own actions. Which just exposes the worst of these situations: endless payback.

If you are going to have two sets of rules then you have no right to call for others to bend to your will. Freewill is a bitch.

By: Cliff

Cliff — Mon, 05 Mar 2012 23:53:07 +0000

Haaaaaahaaaa I think its hilarious that the only response on here about Breitbart was his Ted Kennedy tweets. Holy shit, how obvious all you leftists read hoffpo at the same time to form your opinions. Just awesome!

By: Aced it

Aced it — Mon, 05 Mar 2012 22:50:27 +0000

Yes yes, the only thing I would argue is whether we hold Adam to the same standard as a written article. Without debating it because I need to take a shit, I would say no; lesser standard. I would also propose legislation be sent to congress, officially recognizing the 70′s and certain writers therein, as a creative void. Perhaps paving the way for the world’s largest class action.

By: Aced it

Aced it — Mon, 05 Mar 2012 22:42:16 +0000

Like anyone cares about a lawyers unsolicited opinion.

By: Aced it

Aced it — Mon, 05 Mar 2012 22:39:15 +0000

What all you “did he read the article” guys are missing is that he intimately knew the deceased. Also, you’re trying to rationalize taking pot shots at the recently deceased. I know you want to get on your keyboard and argue but I would recommend that you think about all that you’re defending before you start typing. If I talked for hours a day I know I’d contradict myself all the time. There’s excusable contradictions and there’s inexcusable contradictions. I’ll let you decide which one this, a guy defending his dead friend, is. His thesis is don’t talk bad about the recently dead. You’d have to infer that he likely wouldn’t defend Breitbart’s comments against the bloated one.

Also, RS is not what it used to be, I blame that on the 90′s.

That said, I didn’t respect the pointed editing attack job Breitbart did on that Ag Admin lady. That was worse than all of RS’s many horrible articles combined.

By: Jonah

Jonah — Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:00:07 +0000

I like bikes and I like trees. The trees like me and so do the bikes.

By: REB

REB — Mon, 05 Mar 2012 15:26:58 +0000

Sunday School is good – but for the tiresome hack working with Penn and inserting courtesy laughs.