<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Morgan Spurlock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adamcarolla.com/morgan-spurlock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adamcarolla.com/morgan-spurlock/</link>
	<description>The Adam Carolla Show - A Free Daily Comedy Podcast from Adam Carolla</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:21:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stevie OneLeg</title>
		<link>http://adamcarolla.com/morgan-spurlock/#comment-24911</link>
		<dc:creator>Stevie OneLeg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 04:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamcarolla.com/?p=10726#comment-24911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, Adam: The reason children&#039;s book authors don&#039;t write for grownups is because (other than you) grownups don&#039;t buy books to look at the pictures.

Most children&#039;s books are illustration-centered, and the plot is secondary. An illustrator who wants to illustrate for a living often discovers the shortest path to success is to write AND illustrate children&#039;s books. Perhaps that is why the plot-development is not up to your high standards, but clearly the children&#039;s book market doesn&#039;t have the same desire for high-falutin&#039; literature as do you.

I also find it hilarious that a self-proclaimed &quot;functional illiterate&quot; spends so much oxygen engaging in literary criticism.

Contrary to the above, I do, in fact, love the podcast (yes, even your irrational rants - they are wildly entertaining and occasionally brilliant). I adore Allison&#039;s quick wit, and Bryan is the King of Drops and Ad-libs.

So even though you are completely, 100% wrong about Sendak, I wouldn&#039;t change a thing about your podcast, I love every minute.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Adam: The reason children&#8217;s book authors don&#8217;t write for grownups is because (other than you) grownups don&#8217;t buy books to look at the pictures.</p>
<p>Most children&#8217;s books are illustration-centered, and the plot is secondary. An illustrator who wants to illustrate for a living often discovers the shortest path to success is to write AND illustrate children&#8217;s books. Perhaps that is why the plot-development is not up to your high standards, but clearly the children&#8217;s book market doesn&#8217;t have the same desire for high-falutin&#8217; literature as do you.</p>
<p>I also find it hilarious that a self-proclaimed &#8220;functional illiterate&#8221; spends so much oxygen engaging in literary criticism.</p>
<p>Contrary to the above, I do, in fact, love the podcast (yes, even your irrational rants &#8211; they are wildly entertaining and occasionally brilliant). I adore Allison&#8217;s quick wit, and Bryan is the King of Drops and Ad-libs.</p>
<p>So even though you are completely, 100% wrong about Sendak, I wouldn&#8217;t change a thing about your podcast, I love every minute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Onny</title>
		<link>http://adamcarolla.com/morgan-spurlock/#comment-24782</link>
		<dc:creator>An Onny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 04:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamcarolla.com/?p=10726#comment-24782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adam&#039;s kind of right about today&#039;s children&#039;s books. They are so dumbed down compared to those of 100 years ago.  Look at the original Winnie the Pooh, that had a target audience of around 5, yet it was pretty complex.  And Uncle Wiggily, the gentleman rabbit.  Peter Pan, Alice In Wonderland, Mary Poppins. The originals, I&#039;m talking about, not the Disney versions. They were all written quite cleverly. A 5 year old could understand them, but an adult reading it would also find them interesting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam&#8217;s kind of right about today&#8217;s children&#8217;s books. They are so dumbed down compared to those of 100 years ago.  Look at the original Winnie the Pooh, that had a target audience of around 5, yet it was pretty complex.  And Uncle Wiggily, the gentleman rabbit.  Peter Pan, Alice In Wonderland, Mary Poppins. The originals, I&#8217;m talking about, not the Disney versions. They were all written quite cleverly. A 5 year old could understand them, but an adult reading it would also find them interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil landers</title>
		<link>http://adamcarolla.com/morgan-spurlock/#comment-24701</link>
		<dc:creator>phil landers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 12:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamcarolla.com/?p=10726#comment-24701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;He’s a dumb guys idea of a smart guy&quot; . Touche&#039; Mr. Hatchett and I agree wholeheartedly with Joel&#039;s comment on the bootstraps theme.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;He’s a dumb guys idea of a smart guy&#8221; . Touche&#8217; Mr. Hatchett and I agree wholeheartedly with Joel&#8217;s comment on the bootstraps theme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hood</title>
		<link>http://adamcarolla.com/morgan-spurlock/#comment-24621</link>
		<dc:creator>Hood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 18:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamcarolla.com/?p=10726#comment-24621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the best parts of ths show was when Thomas Edison used his time machine to record Maurice Sendak&#039;s voice on wax cylinder.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the best parts of ths show was when Thomas Edison used his time machine to record Maurice Sendak&#8217;s voice on wax cylinder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exploiting TheFunneh</title>
		<link>http://adamcarolla.com/morgan-spurlock/#comment-24581</link>
		<dc:creator>Exploiting TheFunneh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 02:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamcarolla.com/?p=10726#comment-24581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adam doesn&#039;t understand Sendak. That&#039;s why he doesn&#039;t like it. And when you don&#039;t understand the subtleties of writing for the subconscious mind, you say, &quot;it sucks.&quot; Adam goes even further. Because he read a different poorly written children&#039;s book, now ALL writers who don&#039;t also write successful adult fare are &quot;bad writers&quot;.  Adam makes his money from funny generalizing, but that is also his weakness intellectually.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam doesn&#8217;t understand Sendak. That&#8217;s why he doesn&#8217;t like it. And when you don&#8217;t understand the subtleties of writing for the subconscious mind, you say, &#8220;it sucks.&#8221; Adam goes even further. Because he read a different poorly written children&#8217;s book, now ALL writers who don&#8217;t also write successful adult fare are &#8220;bad writers&#8221;.  Adam makes his money from funny generalizing, but that is also his weakness intellectually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gina</title>
		<link>http://adamcarolla.com/morgan-spurlock/#comment-24562</link>
		<dc:creator>gina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 17:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamcarolla.com/?p=10726#comment-24562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[fruitless mulberry? nonsense. that weed is tree tobacco! i can even see the little yellow flowers in this photo. its a native plant, but very weedy, it will grow anywhere - obviously! and bonus, you can totally smoke it bro!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fruitless mulberry? nonsense. that weed is tree tobacco! i can even see the little yellow flowers in this photo. its a native plant, but very weedy, it will grow anywhere &#8211; obviously! and bonus, you can totally smoke it bro!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hollie P.</title>
		<link>http://adamcarolla.com/morgan-spurlock/#comment-24514</link>
		<dc:creator>Hollie P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 18:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamcarolla.com/?p=10726#comment-24514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i love that a functional illiterate is tearing down the writing of Maurice Sendak.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i love that a functional illiterate is tearing down the writing of Maurice Sendak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://adamcarolla.com/morgan-spurlock/#comment-24504</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 17:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamcarolla.com/?p=10726#comment-24504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Morgan, Can we see your food logs?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Morgan, Can we see your food logs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gina</title>
		<link>http://adamcarolla.com/morgan-spurlock/#comment-24478</link>
		<dc:creator>Gina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 13:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamcarolla.com/?p=10726#comment-24478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Me too! Especially when they break out into improv.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me too! Especially when they break out into improv.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ross</title>
		<link>http://adamcarolla.com/morgan-spurlock/#comment-24477</link>
		<dc:creator>ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 13:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamcarolla.com/?p=10726#comment-24477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carolla and Brian are wrong about $68 in LA being the most expensive parking ticket. In New York it&#039;s $105]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carolla and Brian are wrong about $68 in LA being the most expensive parking ticket. In New York it&#8217;s $105</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
